Mode‐of‐action analysis of the effects induced by nicotine in the in vitro micronucleus assay


Authored by  D Smart, FR Helbling, M Verardo, D McHugh, P Vanscheeuwijck

Published in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis    

Abstract

Nicotine's genotoxic potential has been extensively studied in vitro. While the results of mammalian cell‐based studies have inferred that it can potentially damage chromosomes, in general and with few exceptions, adverse DNA effects have been observed primarily at supra‐physiological concentrations in non‐regulatory assays that provide little information on its mode‐of‐action (MoA). In this study, a modern‐day regulatory genotoxicity assessment was conducted using a flow cytometry‐based in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay, Good Laboratory Practice study conditions, Chinese hamster ovary cells of known provenance, and acceptance/evaluation criteria from the current OECD Test Guideline 487. Nicotine concentrations up to 3.95 mM had no effect on background levels of DNA damage; however, concentrations above the point‐of‐departure range of 3.94–4.54 mM induced increases in MN and hypodiploid nuclei, indicating a possible aneugenicity hazard. Follow‐up experiments designed to elucidate nicotine's MoA revealed cellular vacuolisation, accompanying distortions in microtubules, inhibition of tubulin polymerization, centromere‐positive DNA, and multinucleate cells at MN‐inducing concentrations. Vacuoles likely originated from acidic cellular compartments (e.g., lysosomes). Remarkably, genotoxicity was suppressed by chemicals that raised the luminal pH of these organelles. Other endpoints (e.g., changes in phosphorylated histones) measured in the study cast doubt on the biological relevance of this apparent genotoxicity. In addition, three major nicotine metabolites, including cotinine, had no MN effects but nornicotine induced a nicotine‐like profile. It is possible that nicotine's lysosomotropic properties drive the genotoxicity observed in vitro; however, the potency and mechanistic insights revealed here indicate that it is likely of minimal physiological relevance for nicotine consumers.